Auguries, Magic Spells, and Some Early Returns
Johnson City, TN --This year's campaign is beginning to resemble the last days of the Roman Republic. During the past week, rightwing politicians who normally worship at the altar of infallible markets (when not reminding us that they are good Christians) have been busy casting the entrails and practicing various forms of divination instead. They have been handing out tire-gauge amulets to ridicule the idea that keeping our tires inflated will help bring down the price of oil. They are right -- proper tire inflation is an utterly inadequate response -- it would save only three percent of the gas we burn.
For most of us, this makes their own solution -- drilling off the coast, which would yield only one percent of our oil consumption -- even more ludicrous. But that's only because we continue to believe that three is bigger than one. If you cast the auguries right, as the Romans did, perhaps the McCain campaign is right -- one is now bigger than three.
Then there is the promise that the future could change the past. Not possible, said Omar Khayyam -- "the moving finger writes, and having writ moves on..." But the Oil Republicans assure us that we can bring down the price of gasoline this year not by anything we do now but by bringing in new oil fields in 2030. And McCain says that by the mere act of announcing that an area is open to leasing, oil will immediately begin flowing -- as if at the moment Exxon is allowed to strike the earth with a magic wand a gusher will erupt (an environmentally sensitive gusher of course).
And finally there is the power of magic spells. For the past several days, about thirty House Republicans have been sitting in the darkened chambers of the U.S. Capitol (Congress is in recess) demanding that the Democrats agreed to open environmentally sensitive areas on the coast to drilling. "Drill now! Drill here!" their voices have echoed across the old Caucus Chamber of the Capitol. This week they claimed that their incantations had actually been responsible for bringing down the price of oil! "I think the market is responding to the fact that we are here talking," said Arizona Congressman John Shadegg.
Well, if this is true, I am delighted. There is absolutely no environmental harm in thirty aging, white, largely male members of Congress sitting in the dark and muttering to each other, "drill, drill, drill." If that can lower the price of oil by last week's ten percent, then it is considerably more effective, much quicker, and vastly safer and cheaper than actually drilling -- it's definitely less boring than inflating tires! If this really works, then I think it is the patriotic duty of these members of Congress to remain constantly on duty in the Capitol, like vestal virgins, preserving America from high oil prices.
In bipartisan fairness, however, perhaps we should demand that Democratic members of Congress sit in their own part of the Capitol -- perhaps the Rayburn room -- chanting "Cool! Cool! Cool!" to stop global warming. Al Gore, of course, has been doing this for some time -- but perhaps these spells only work when muttered inside the sacred precincts of the Capitol, in unison, and when no one is listening.
But voters, it appears, are a tad skeptical. One of the chanters in the Republican caucus was Tennessee Representative David Davis. Davis was spending his time in the Capitol, when perhaps he should have been back home in Johnson City, Tennessee, campaigning. Because Tuesday he was upset by his Republican opponent, Johnson City Mayor Phil Roe, who blasted Davis for being a tool of big oil.
Roe specifically went after Davis for his advocacy of drilling, and for taking campaign contributions from Big Oil. If you'd like to see the first campaign ad on energy issues to decide an election this year, take a look.
Perhaps the pundits who are claiming that the voters want candidates who pander to the oil industry should take a close look at this race. After all, the last time a sitting Congressman in Tennessee lost a primary was back in 1966.

Instead of focusing on this Republican vs Democrat garbage why don't we just count who the good people are in Congress, re-elect them, then find some more good people (regardless of ideology) to replace the bad ones? I like the fact that the Sierra Club is pro-actively working for positive change but I get very tired of the 'Democrats good' 'Republicans bad' mantra. What we need are people with common sense who want to fix the problems at the national level instead of worrying about the opinions of a minority back at home.
Posted by: UTDrew | August 13, 2008 at 01:10 PM
To UTDrew
Read the whole article. He's criticizing both sides, not just republicans. No need to get all butthurt.
Posted by: Steve | August 16, 2008 at 01:39 AM
There are people in both parties who are environmentally aware and active. I think we're having growing pains right now. Everyone knows we have to change, and there's a great discussion going on about how to do that. New ideas are emerging. It's time to listen to each other, consider all sides of the issue, and work together. That means the unthinkable to some people, but that's how change happens.
A million and a half Americans have signed the "drill here, drill now" petition. Lots of them are really suffering from high gas prices. While I disagree with their solution, I agree with the call for Congress to get moving on this issue.
But it's really going to take an effort by everyone, not just our elected leaders, and it needs to be solution oriented. I lean toward a more voluntary approach rather than have excessive government regulation. I believe Americans have the stuff to handle the responsibility that goes with this freedom.
Think of Rosie the Riveter. We can do it.
Posted by: Julia | August 16, 2008 at 04:25 PM
If we let the Alaskan have anything to say, she'll be killing the wolfe and the bear to allow Moose to live --- long enough for the hunters to hunt her down.
We just published a cartoon depicting what we think our environmental policy will look like with this attitude under our editorials.
Posted by: Lidia LoPinto | September 09, 2008 at 05:09 PM
You can't fight Washington or Albany with more politicians, that you guys fund so they might, just might, vote green.
What happened to the old Sierra club? You can only fight the politicians with the power of the people. Public relations campaign focused on issues, that put pressure on politicians of all sectors.
Save the whale, save a bird, save a frog but for goodness sake don't spend our donations on politicians campaigns. We ain't that rich. It won't make a difference. Changing the politicians won't make a difference. If you can buy them for a few bucks, so can Chevron, Exxon and anyone else with more money. You have to change the minds of Chevron, Exxon and those guys to go green. That's the ticket laddy.
Posted by: Lidia LoPinto | September 09, 2008 at 05:12 PM