There are a few truths that make the fundamental case that investing in the emerging next economy is the clearest path to long term competitive portfolio performance. First, innovation – meaning improving economic output without increasing material or capital inputs - always wins. This is simply how capitalism works, money chasing the best ideas, and has been the basis of the industrial revolution. Second, successfully mitigating the worst effects of economically and societally disastrous climate change (that we're not already irreversibly committed to) will save enormous costs, provide generational investment opportunities and also be inestimably economically stimulative.
For over a decade now, Green Alpha cofounders Jeremy Deems and I have been wondering when popular awareness of these truths would emerge. And while I can't represent that we're there yet, I can say that we definitely are noticing a major shift in both frequency and tone of recent journalism and punditry on the subject of sustainability economics. Fellow green economist Tom Konrad got me thinking about all this when he asked me and a few other money managers for thoughts about 2013 for his Forbes piece on the subject. The more I thought about framing an answer, the more I realized how much momentum I’ve been noticing just over the last quarter or so. To give an idea of what I mean, here's a representative but far from complete list of some smart people and organizations articulating a vision of and working towards a next economy wherein society can thrive without exceeding earth's tolerances or threatening the underpinnings of the global economy. Each of these is worth delving into in its own right.
- PricewaterhouseCoopers’
November 2012 report
titled “Too late for two degrees?” (N.B., 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) states flatly
that “[i]t’s
time to plan for a warmer world.”
Since, as they conclude, to limit warming to two degrees Celsius, the world
needs to begin slowing its carbon dioxide emissions “by 5.1 percent every year from now to 2050, essentially slamming the
breaks on [CO2 emissions] growth starting right now," is not going to
happen, we need to take all realistic mitigation steps we can and also plan for
adaptation. Coming as it does from a mainstream accounting and auditing firm
with no tree hugger ax to grind, this serves as a particularly stark warning,
but also signals the truly massive scale of the investment opportunity.
- The National Research Council’s report (via the National Academy) on climate change and national
security, “Climate
and Social Stress: Implications for Security Analysis,” released in November
2012, was “prepared at the request of the U.S. intelligence community.”
It provides a clear-eyed look at economic and politico-social consequences of
climate change. It states, in part, “[a]s
a practical matter, [climate change] means that significant burdens of
adaptation will be imposed on all societies and that unusually severe climate
perturbations will [be] encountered in some parts of the world over the next
decade with an increasing frequency and severity thereafter. There is
compelling reason to presume that specific failures of adaptation will occur
with consequences more severe than any yet experienced, severe enough to compel
more extensive international engagement than has yet been anticipated or
organized.” When realized, this “more extensive international engagement” means
more opportunities for companies providing solutions, and crucially, in this
case, the momentum for economic transition is coming from the security and
intelligence community. The more disparate the voices urging transition, the
closer to popular inflection we become.
- Not to be outdone by the National Academy, the World Bank (also in
November 2012) warned that in its opinion, the globe is
on track for warming of four degrees Celsius (7.2 degrees Fahrenheit) if
mitigation does not commence immediately. The Bank, in asserting that that kind
of warming could devastate the global economy, cited in particular “Ocean Acidification,” “Heat
Extremes,” “Lower agricultural yields,” and “Risks to Human Support Systems.” The Bank concludes by indicating a pressing need
for “increased support for adaptation, mitigation, inclusive
green growth and climate-smart development.”
- Warren
Buffett’s MidAmerican Renewables has been pouring money into renewable energy
projects. In addition to US$11 billion invested in renewable energies over the
last year or so, MidAmerican just announced that it’s investing $2.5 billion more for a 579 Megawatt plant in Los
Angeles County. As MidAmerican’s Chief Financial
Officer Patrick Goodman recently said, “we believe renewables is the better investment right
now.” Buffett, certainly not one
to invest this kind of money for the sake of being “green,” sums up the
opportunity this way:
“[m]any
more wind and solar projects will almost certainly follow.”
- The U.S. Department of Defense, which cares first about national
security, second about costs and traditionally not much about ecology, has
nevertheless put together America’s single most impressive list of renewable energy and low and zero emissions transportation
initiatives. Why? As then Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Dennis McGinn said, “Ultimately,
as we gain proficiency in generating sustainable, renewable energy sources as a
nation we build national strengths and stability.” How far is the military
going with these projects? “The DOD is positioned to become
the single most important driver of the cleantech revolution in the United
States,” according to
Clint Wheelock, president of Pike Research, one of America’s leading pure
research firms on the subject of renewable energy.
- The insurance
industry, which ultimately has to pay every time there’s a new climate
disaster, has had enough. Munich RE, a leading global reinsurer whose climate practice releases key reports on the economic risks of climate change, in
October wrote
(registration required), "[i]n the long term, anthropogenic climate change
is believed to be a significant loss driver…It particularly affects formation of
heatwaves, droughts, thunderstorms and -- in the long run -- tropical cyclone
intensity."
- Reuters recently published a piece explaining “Why you need a climate change portfolio,” using the cogent argument “[w]hether you believe in man-made global warming or not, it's undeniable that trillions of dollars will be spent on technologies to address the collateral damage of climate change.” We do believe in climate change, so we think there may be reason for all those dollars to flow to the appropriate mitigation and adaptation technologies with even more velocity than Reuters may be assuming.
- 350.org’s
“Fossil Free” institutional divestment campaign is, amazingly, already starting
to see some traction. Really. From 350’s website: “Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn sent a letter to the
city’s two chief pension funds on friday [sic], formally requesting that they ‘refrain
from future investments in fossil fuel companies and begin the process of
divesting our pension portfolio from those companies.’”
- Even
the slow-to-change traditional investment banking industry is showing signs of
tuning into reality. In a blog post on its website, the New York Times cites evidence for “A
Change in the Weather on Wall Street,” largely as a result of superstorm Sandy,
which impacted Wall Street directly. But in addition, “[t]he other new argument is economic. Until this
year, the political calculus about climate change had only one side. The oil
and coal companies made sure everyone knew about the costs of action. But few people
mentioned the costs of inaction. Now they cannot be ignored.”
Public opinion has already begun to change. According to Yale University’s Public Support for Climate and Energy Policies (Nov 13, 2012) report, “A large majority of Americans (77%) say global warming should be a “very high” (18%), “high” (25%), or “medium” priority (34%) for the president and Congress. One in four (23%) say it should be a low priority.”
These are just the first few recent ‘tipping point’-like stories to come to mind. I've read dozens more examples recently, and I feel the fact that I can no longer be aware of all the evidence of inflection much less keep track of it all is surely a sign in itself.
There are several additional trends underway now that may have significant impacts on renewable energy companies and their stocks in 2013: the new, emerging ways to invest in and to monetize electric utility revenues from scale solar and wind plants, and infrastructure upgrades to accommodate a renewables-friendly distributed smart grid (especially where networks have been damaged (such as in the wake of superstorm Sandy). Each of these presents opportunities and interesting ways to invest.
For us, though, the most interesting macroeconomic trend is simply that the green economy is finally showing signs of approaching a meaningful inflection point into mainstream consciousness.
Adding it all up, it sure seems like the time is now.
Garvin Jabusch is cofounder and chief investment officer of Green Alpha ® Advisors, and is co-manager of the Green Alpha ® Next Economy Index, or GANEX and the Sierra Club Green Alpha Portfolio. He also authors the blog "Green Alpha's Next Economy."



Good to see mainstream attention to scientific and environmental issues, hopefully plenty of innovative ideas emerge which work for the planet and our economy.
I'm Cristina Deptula with Synchronized Chaos International Magazine, and we're working with author and ecologist Dr. John Berger, who's come out with the first book in his new climate science series, Climate Myths. This book examines how and why many people in the United States underestimate the urgency of dealing with global climate change, or even deny that it's occurring.
Climate Myths explains how leaders within the fossil fuel industry embarked upon a public relations campaign to downplay potential problems associated with climate change. Using strategies developed by Big Tobacco, they deflected the issue, making it seem that climate issues were inconsequential, confusing, and above all, too expensive to tackle. The book goes through each of these industry-propagated myths and common misconceptions, debunking them with real science.
However, if fossil fuel industry leaders and ordinary people accepted the challenge of developing more sustainable and efficient technologies, the research and development process could actually represent a great economic opportunity for the industry and the Western world. Dr. Berger will discuss this in more detail in his next two books, along with providing a readable climate science primer for the public.
Dr. Berger has consulted for the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences, along with Fortune 500 companies and other nonprofit groups and governmental organizations, including the U.S. Congress. With a doctorate in ecology from UC Davis, he helped to launch the environmental restoration movement with his book Restoring The Earth, sharing stories of ordinary people cleaning up polluted areas and taking action for the environment where they live.
We would love to provide copies of this book for review and/or giveaway, please let us know if that would interest you. Pictures of Dr. Berger and a jpeg of the book cover are available upon request, and a press release is attached.
Thanks very much,
Cristina
510-589-8252
Posted by: Cristina Deptula | 01/09/2013 at 05:47 PM
Wonderful article. Continue the good work. Toxic Mold & Tort http://www.bulkping.com/rss-feed-generator-creator/feed/c6f5b87b4febb16827b90a6565d9e51b.xml
Posted by: Toxic Mold & Tort | 02/02/2013 at 01:55 AM