Electronic Waste Flows "Virtually Unrestricted"
Used electronics shipped to developing countries from the United States are supposed to help bridge "the digital divide," says a new report from the watchdog arm of Congress--not support an industry that relies on toxic, open-air fires, acid baths, and cheap labor to recover precious metals from high-tech trash. Examining the fate of electronics exported by U.S. "recyclers," investigators from the Government Accountability Office, or GAO, found that computers, cell phones, printers, and other devices too often end up being dismantled abroad under unsafe conditions.
Who's responsible for the situation? While groups like Greenpeace and the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition have called on manufacturers to eliminate harmful substances from product designs, regulation of hazardous waste disposal falls to the EPA, an agency described in the 63-page report as having an overly narrow focus and lax enforcement when it comes to e-waste.
Current regulations control only cathode-ray tubes, which are found in older TV sets and computer monitors. The tubes contain copper--a valuable commodity on the scrap metal market--and up to four pounds of lead, a known toxin. Americans are discarding them by the millions these days, in part because of the upcoming U.S. conversion to digital from analog TV signals, and the EPA requires exporters to notify the agency before shipping the devices abroad for repair or recycling.
According to the report, other used electronics "flow virtually unrestricted, even to countries where they can be mismanaged." Rule or no rule, GAO investigators found that cathode-ray tubes also flow freely as a result of lax enforcement. Posing as foreign buyers of broken CRTs in Hong Kong, India, Pakistan, and other countries, they found 43 U.S. companies--including several that tout green practices and hold Earth Day recycling drives--willing to violate the CRT rule. Investigators also spoke with EPA officials, who said "they have neither plans nor a timetable to develop an enforcement program."
But according to GAO, it doesn't have to be this way. The report includes recommendations for the EPA to not only beef up enforcement, but also expand regulations to control electronics that--while benign when intact--become hazardous upon dismantling, encourage Congress to ratify the Basel Convention, and work with other government agencies to improve oversight of used electronics. "Options such as these," the report says, "could help make U.S. export controls more consistent with those of other industrialized countries."
::via Washington Post
Fast fact: One metric ton of computer scrap contains more gold than 17 metric tons of ore and much lower levels of arsenic, mercury, sulfur, and other dangerous elements commonly found in ores, according to GAO.
Read more about technology, electronic waste, and recycling:
New and Next Big Things in Ridesharing
Big Time Recycling
Green Cell Phone Evolution
Google Goes Big for Geothermal
Shopping Gone Good?
Textbook Downloads--Green or Not?




I love the picture at the top of the post, what laptop is that?
Posted by: Gadgets and Electronics | September 21, 2008 at 07:05 AM
While the situation with exporting electronics is certainly bad it could be a lot worst. The EPA has started to advertise to electronics recyclers that exporting CRT monitors does require notification to the EPA other electronics do not require any notification.
Why do recycling companies export electronics? Because of the price of commodities, electronics recycling firms make in most cases 30% of their revenue from the commodities they generate. If they don’t export the electronics they will have to charge more for their services which would yield lower recycling rates and ultimately the electronics would end up in the land fill.
People in the US don’t want to pay to recycle electronics. So what should we do?
Check out our blog that is coming soon. www.pcrecycler.net
Posted by: jeremy farber | September 21, 2008 at 07:36 PM
This Is a very informative blog , I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog . It helped me with ocean of knowledge so I really belive you will do much better in the future . Good job web master .
http://www.shredderwarehouse.com
Posted by: Paper Shredders | October 24, 2008 at 01:54 AM
One aspect you didn't mention that will have a profound effect on eWaste is holding on to our existing equipment a little longer.
Each of us using things for 6 months longer before replacing would make a world of difference.
Posted by: weee recycle | June 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Nice post,good site,thks.
Posted by: wholesale jewelry | June 24, 2009 at 01:25 AM