Turning Green Into Green
Cutting-edge green technologies that have the potential to improve quality of life, reduce environmental impact -- and make a lot of money. This last point has been traditionally ignored by many scientists and environmentalists. Climate change has been scientifically proven, so everyone should hop on the bandwagon, right? Wind power has the potential to create more jobs and revenue in the long run than mountaintop-removal mining, so let’s do it right? Wrong!!
Despite the optimism of altruistic start-ups, for most entrepreneurs, the bottom line is still… well, the bottom line. Politicians, social activists, and businesses talk about greening the economy, but many of the world’s most popular sustainable business plans don't immediately turn profits.
MBA students and faculty at UC Berkeley are trying to address this problem by learning how to really sell a green business. According to the school:
"Our students have developed a new model of collaboration across disciplines that can break through the bottlenecks that have so often prevented technology transfer from our labs and research centers into the commercial sector," says Jay Stowsky, Haas School senior assistant dean for instruction and former senior economist for science and technology with the White House Council of Economic Advisers.”
Armed with perspectives from business, law, public policy, engineering, and molecular biology, the students are assessing technologies that include a novel solar-chemical storage device, a breakthrough fabrication method for high-efficiency solid-state photovoltaic devices, and the use of ionic liquids to pre-treat biomass for conversion to biofuel.
Not too shabby. What do you think? I like the idea of a well-trained legion of aspiring green moguls wielding plans and patents. Let's hope they can convince venture capitalists and corporations that green isn’t just good for the environment -- it’s good business, too.
-- Mario Aguilar




in the meantime, maybe sierra club can start promoting feed in tariffs, which have already proven to be incredibly effective at ramping up adoption of clean renewable energy that does not kill off our open spaces. it continues to baffle me that SC can support Big Energy monopolists who are using our money and our land to build their private profit-centers, while refusing to support much cleaner, point of use renewables owned by its membership - who can get PAID for producing more energy than they use.
what gives? where is the support for feed in tariffs? even albania has them, but CA does not? all the posturing and greenwashing in the world won't change the facts. you cannot kill off our wilderness and call it "saving the planet." mutually exclusive.
Posted by: sheila | December 03, 2008 at 03:01 PM