Hey Mr. Green,
I know fluorescent lightbulbs are more efficient than incandescents. In
terms of overall resource use, however, is it better to replace a
functioning incandescent bulb now or wait until it burns out? --Tom
(submitted by e-mail)
I salute you for wondering about what goes into industrial processes. Some people chirp about a "postindustrial" era as if their toys were birthed by an invisible techno-god--rather than a polluting, energy-burning, all-too-earthly system.
Anyway, replace incandescents now. The resources used to produce either kind of lightbulb represent a fraction (as little as one percent, according to researchers at the Technical University of Denmark) of the bulb's overall toll on the environment. Powering the bulb in your home uses far more energy.
Say you have a 100-watt incandescent that has provided 500 hours of light. If it burns for another 500 hours, it will consume 50 kilowatt-hours. That's four times the energy a compact fluorescent bulb would require to produce the same amount of light and nearly 30 times the energy needed to produce a new CFL. Generating those extra kilowatts-hours for the incandescent with fossil fuel would require the equivalent of almost three gallons of gasoline or 35 pounds of coal.
But don't rest content just because you've installed fluorescents. Turn out the lights when not needed--having a more efficient device doesn't mean you should waste energy. And recycle CFLs, because they contain a small amount of mercury, a toxic metal.


Great answer about CFLs. May I ask one more question? It is commonly said that flicking a fluorescent bulb on and off lessens the bulb's life span. Mostly I read that a fluorescent should be left on for no less than 15 minutes. That makes them inappropriate for many places, like closets or stairways, where light is needed for a short time. (Well, that and their extended warmup time.) Is this true?
Posted by: Patrick | November 21, 2008 at 04:54 PM
I was just wondering the same thing. I hate to throw out perfectly good bulbs, but I guess it will benefit me in the long run. I have noticed how much longer the CFLs last. I guess I will finish changing them out today! Thanks for the answer.
Posted by: kate | January 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Thank you for good advices and article.
Posted by: Error Nuker | March 18, 2009 at 12:04 AM
Ha, lucky me, because I quit using lightbulbs! they are really annoying and besides, you have to change them over and over... I'd rather use LED lights!
Posted by: Tadalafil | October 29, 2010 at 02:28 PM
Better yet, replace your bulbs whether incandescent or fluorescent with solar panels.This is the most sustainable way to use free and renewable energy plus it does not use any gasoline or coal so it basically is harmless to the environment.
Posted by: Solar Panels | September 13, 2011 at 07:02 PM
Interesting, but what I have wondered about this is should you keep either a fluorescent or regular light on as this uses less energy or turn them off only to turn them on again which uses more enegy?? Does this deoend on the type of lightbulb which is being used.
Posted by: yamahaef1000is | December 19, 2011 at 03:24 AM