Hey Mr. Green,
If I were to put solar panels on my home, would it be cost-effective? I see most solar panels in hot climates, and Ohio can be very cold. I live on a five-acre tract and have the option of wind turbines also. --Sherry in Dayton, Ohio
It may get cold in Dayton, but that doesn't mean you don't get sun. In fact, you get 80 percent as much sunlight in a year as Sacramento, California, whose municipal utility is a leader in solar development.
First, consider the low-tech route: efficiency. The average U.S. household consumes 11,000 kilowatt-hours per year, when many could get by on half as much. Eliminate waste by turning off lights and appliances when not in use, for example, and you could slash your energy costs with no investment.
Wherever you live, take a look at returns over the long haul. At $9 a watt, which is the typical cost in your region, a solar energy system large enough to generate power for an average household would cost roughly $80,000 after rebates and tax credits (or less in areas with stronger incentive programs). In Ohio, as in most states, if you generate more than you use, your excess power feeds into the electricity grid and you earn credit for it, allowing you to draw out as much as you put in--for free.
Still, it would take about 30 years for you to break even, assuming the utility rate goes up 4 percent a year and you put money saved from your energy bills into tax-deferred investments. But you'd keep more than 260 tons of greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere over the life of the system.
Once you nail down the cost per watt for solar, contact wind power dealers and see how their costs compare. It's hard to be more specific about wind power because there's so much variation, depending on windmill height and local topography. You might also consider systems that combine wind and solar if wind blows much harder in the winter than in the summer. These hybrid systems take advantage of seasonal variation. Meanwhile, be thankful that Big Oil hasn't privatized the sun and forced us to pay for it right down to the last photon.


An alternative which wasn't asked for but which I think you should have mentioned is using solar panels for heating water. New, high efficiency, well insulated solar water heaters are cost effective in most of the US and are much cheaper to install than solar electric, plus they are considerably cheaper.
I have investigated both for my location in Oregon, and the water heater is a viable option for me and is on my to do list.
Posted by: Carl Carter | December 19, 2008 at 11:24 AM
A worthy analysis. What I would also like to see included are the social and environmental costs associated with both the current situation and any alternatives. A number of countries incorporate these costs into the costs of products and services, to internalize the externalities and help the decision making process, a la Pigou. The state of Wisconsin did such an analysis for the statewide recycling program and the numbers were quite large ($285 a ton benefit from recycling).
On a different issue, I was very surprised to see that the average US home uses 11,000 KWH a year. I have a pretty standard 3 bedroom ranch home in southern Wisconsin and use about 2,400 KWH a year. It would be of interest to know why the average US home is over 4 times that level, since I haven't really done that much to reduce electrical use, beyond replacing most incandescents with fluorescents and not using either air conditioning nor dehumidifiers.
John Reindl
John Muir Chapter Member
Madison, WI
Posted by: John Reindl | December 22, 2008 at 04:45 PM
In NW Ohio, we use nearly 10-11,000 KWH per year (3 small kids, house built 1996, 1800 sq. ft.). This is double our use prior to the children (think lights left on). A/C contributes about 1,000 KWH during the summer.
NW Ohioan
Posted by: Tony R | December 23, 2008 at 06:41 PM
I found your response to sherry in Dayton, Ohio about solar collection and wind collection irresponsible. You, of all people should understand that any heat gain, developed from any system, will be lost through poor insulation. Compact Fluorescents are a must- as is upgrading the home envelope.
A critical look at your home's insulation and heat loss should always be the first step in analyzing the potential for energy sustainability.
In the future, I would hope that you would encourage your readers to address the most basic framework of heat loss in their homes, in order to protect that they are getting the most out of their solar panel investment.
Ron Tisue
Solarbank Energy Systems
Cincinnati, Ohio
Posted by: Ron Tisue | December 29, 2008 at 10:28 AM
a comment on your suggestions for solar power. In addition to
photovoltaic systems to produce electricity, one can use solar
energy to heat hot water and support the home heating system.
The German magazine Oekotest published a study last March, indicating
that one can break even in a bit less than 20 years. The hot water
has to be stored in a well-insulated tank. A system with about
10 square meters (90+sqare feet) and a tank capacity about 200 gallons
can supply a family of four with hot water and about 20 percent of the
heat in most places in Germany (assuming a properly integrated system).
These numbers should be comparable in most places in the USA.
PS My neighbor has a solar heating/hot water system and uses no fuel
at all from May to October. My plumbing was not suitable, so I opted
for photovoltaic. It is at the very least a more environmentally
responsible and cheaper toy than a fancy sports car or SUV.
Posted by: Edith Borie | January 14, 2009 at 02:49 AM
Just remember this, the more people buy into this, the cheaper it gets. Soon, one would hope our rubbish governments would get involved!
Posted by: Dave | January 21, 2009 at 09:29 AM
Windmills can be a perfect match for solar systems as a backup for long cloudy periods.
Yet, Ron is right, the house should be visualized as a whole and poor insulation and air leakages should be avoided first.
Posted by: eco futurist | August 19, 2009 at 01:43 AM
interesting! try my link for further analization and to experience having your own wind power.. to save more money and to have an alternative source of energy you need everyday..
check this out..
http://www.windpowercost.org/
Posted by: Gerry Thompson | September 15, 2009 at 05:47 AM
Having your own Wind Turbines at home is a very good way to conserve on your electrical expenses.
Just imagine the amount of money you can save when you have your own power generator providing you with free electricity! A windmill is a very good alternative especially with the economic situation nowadays. It is affordable to your budget and best of all its’ free. You can purchase or build your own wind generator at any hardware store or online site.
Posted by: don bartell | October 29, 2009 at 11:45 PM
You don't just save if you have wind turbines attached to your home: You can actually start selling what energy you don't use to the electric company. This way you can make a little profit to go towards the construction costs of the Wind Turbines. Another cost-saving measure is to upgrade your boiler to a radiant heat system. This way your home will heat up much like the sun would heat up the ground. It uses a lot less energy than a boiler as the heat emanates from the floor, not blowing hot air around the home in a constant fashion only to escape to ceilings and the attic.
Posted by: Radiant Heat | February 19, 2010 at 10:05 AM
It's hard to be more specific about wind power because there's so much variation, depending on windmill height and local topography.
Posted by: used computers | February 28, 2010 at 07:50 PM
Nice post, well written. Where can i find more of your views?
Posted by: Sealed Lead Acid Battery Supplier | March 23, 2010 at 09:05 PM
Great information to help anyone thinking of alternative energy for their home. keep up the good work.
Posted by: Paul | April 17, 2010 at 11:51 AM
A) Commodity money consists of objects used as money that contains their own value, but representative money is a specific group of the commodity objects
B) Commodity money consists of objects that have value in and of themselves, but representative money makes use of objects because the holder can exchange them for something else of value
C) Representative money allows objects to be exchanged for something else, but commodity money has value because the government decreed it is an acceptable means to pay debts
D) Representative money consists of objects that have value in and of themselves, but commodity money makes use of objects because the holder can exchange them for something else of value
Posted by: enzyte male enhancement | April 20, 2010 at 10:34 AM
To most men , experience is like the stern light of a ship which il-luminates only the track it has passed. Do you think so?
Posted by: lacoste shirts | July 11, 2010 at 07:55 PM
we should work be such a significant of human satisfaction.A good share of the answer rest in the kind of pride that
is stimulated by the job, by the activity of accomplishing.Do you think so?
Posted by: air jordans | July 28, 2010 at 02:32 AM
I think that investing in solar energy sources is a very well rewarding act. Not only solar energy is growing fast on the market- almost any alternative energy source is getting more attention investments and development these days.
Posted by: Fastest Growing Forex Broker 2010 | September 17, 2010 at 02:37 AM
I guess the "Saving Money with Solar Power?" is excellent .Investing in solar energy has increased through out the world. I wish you to visit http://investmentsinenergy.com, this site provides more info regarding the solar energy uses and the investment guidelines.
Posted by: Micahkatelynn | September 30, 2010 at 11:55 PM
I admire what you have done here.I like the part where you say you are doing this to give back but I would assume by all the comments that this is working for you as well.
Posted by: Life's Too Good | October 10, 2010 at 10:43 PM
Thanks for that informative post, I think that house electricity will become also hybrid, like hybrid engines, solar energy and standard electricity combined together.
Posted by: truck rental | October 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM
Of course solar can help you to save energy cost. But solar power is ristricted by climates. If it's cloudy or rainny days, you have to use something else as replacement. In fact air-water heat pumps are more ideal: energy-saving and no climate limits. You can see some information on this site:http://www.waveheatpump.com air-water heat pump
Posted by: air water heat pump | November 11, 2010 at 06:38 PM
Solar screens are one of the best ways to cut power bill. It helps to keep the home cool in summers and warm in winters.
Posted by: solar power hot water heaters | November 14, 2010 at 09:21 PM
Yes, you can definitely save money with solar power. Home solar power systems has been very popular nowadays because a lot of people have proven that it is all worth it to invest on it. Besides, you can have more advantages anyway aside from the fact that you can pay less for your electrical bills. Of course, you'd have to observe your climate on where you live, whether you are having much sunlight or that the wind power is much stronger there. You'd have to be wise on choosing which device would be appropriate on your location otherwise your investments would put into waste.
Posted by: Roxie Covelli | December 22, 2010 at 08:10 PM
I agree with you on solar panels as a must-have for every home. This cuts your electric bills by as much as 70-80%. People nowadays are looking for ways to counteract the rising costs of utilities. Not only that, solar panels are also 90% recyclable so basically when you purchase such panels and install them in your home, your hard-earned money is spent wisely.
http://www.i-solar.co.uk
Posted by: Ma.Aprilette Sulib | August 20, 2011 at 10:19 PM