Hey Mr. Green,
I burn wood to heat my home. Otherwise, I use electric heat when I’m away from home. How can I determine my carbon footprint using the wood versus using electricity?
--Dot in Central New York
The comparative size of your carbon footprint depends on the source of your electric power and the quality of your wood burner. If the electric power used to heat your home is generated from coal or other fossil fuels, then your footprint might be bigger than if you're burning wood in a new, efficient, EPA-approved firebox or stove. But if you've got an old, inefficient stove or a traditional fireplace, your footprint could be way bigger than with electric heat. Also remember that you’ve got a major environmental tradeoff here: Even if the new wood burner has a smaller carbon footprint, per unit of energy it still releases a lot more other pollutants into the air than a coal-burning power plant, and it releases them right where you and your neighbors breathe. Burning wood to heat a home emits 250 times as much global-warming methane as burning coal in a power plant.
Electric heating is not such a great choice either. This is because only around 35 percent of the energy in coal gets converted to electricity; the rest is lost as heat, friction, turning the dynamo, and so on.
To calculate the difference between your two sources, you need to think in terms of British thermal units (Btus) and kilowatt-hours (kWh). Really, it's not hard. Bear with me. Since a typical generator's efficiency is only 35 percent, producing one Btu worth of electricity requires about 3 times as many Btus worth of coal to get the same amount of heat from electricity that you’d get from direct combustion of the coal. Since the carbon emissions generated to produce a Btu from burning wood are only a bit less than burning coal, to get 1 Btu from your wood, the total carbon dioxide released from the stove is roughly half that of coal-sourced electric power, provided you had a modern 75 percent-efficient wood stove. But if you've got an ancient stove, or an old-fashioned fireplace, which can be less than 15 percent efficient, then your carbon footprint could zoom up two or three times higher than with electric heat.
Of course, it’s not as easy to regulate the heat in a wood burner as in an electric heater, so you could end up burning more wood than you really need, pushing your carbon footprint up.
Yes, I know, some optimists will object that burning wood actually has no carbon footprint because wood is a "biofuel" and a "renewable" resource, and trees that replace the tree cut for firewood will absorb the global-warming carbon dioxide given off when wood is burned. This is true in the long run, but if we're serious about global warming, there is no long run, as I've already demonstrated here. The reasoning is simple: Even one of the fastest-growing, quickest-sequestering trees that sprouts up today would require 50 years or more to absorb the carbon emitted by burning a single cord (128 cubic feet) of wood (about the amount in a foot-thick 40-foot-long log). With slower growers, we’re talking a century or so. The twin morals of this story are: 1) Be sure to turn your heat down to 55 or lower when you’re out of the house or asleep, and 2) Beware of exaggerated promises about carbon offsets.


What about wood vs. propane?
Posted by: Emily | March 16, 2010 at 02:12 PM
so we should burn coal in coal stoves in our homes, to reduce losses? :-p
Posted by: CTP | March 18, 2010 at 06:50 AM
that's interesting. thanks for a very detailed explanation on burning wood vs using electricity.
Posted by: Paul | March 20, 2010 at 06:11 AM
Nice blog. Loving your views! Where can i find more from you?
Posted by: Odyssey Battery Supplier | March 23, 2010 at 01:57 AM
The thing Is i burn alder trees from my own property as they die. If left to rot they would release all of their stored Co2, plus the rotting process will create methane. So for me I think i am reducing the amount of green house gas by burning rather then letting them rot.
Is this sound thinking on me part?
Posted by: david | March 29, 2010 at 07:53 AM
I believe many grasses are stronger sequesterers of carbon than trees anyway. All the more reason to stop chopping down forests in the first place I guess.
Posted by: EasyBloom Plus Plant Sensor | May 05, 2010 at 09:56 PM
wow
Posted by: wiw | May 24, 2010 at 04:14 PM
Me voy de este blog con varia informacion, me educo mucho, te lo agradezco de veras. Para delvolverte el favor te dejo estos links como aporte, talvez le sirve a alguien que visite tu blog a para vos...
http://www.yourkamagra.com/buy.html
http://www.yourkamagra.com/pills.html
Posted by: kamagra | June 04, 2010 at 02:16 PM
That's a good question isn't it?http://www.edhardyukshop.com
Posted by: ed hardy | July 07, 2010 at 12:18 AM
These well-known UGG Classic Cardy are now becoming more and more fashionable and popular, to some extent. I believe you may ask what the shoes can bring us. As I know, if one person struck by lightning in Holland, his family must put all his Classic Cardy Boots up as soon as possible. And in the fairy tale, the shoes are more magic indeed. Now, I always say that the UGG Classic Cardy Boots are so magic and popular.http://www.uggscardy.com
Posted by: ugg boots | July 21, 2010 at 06:42 PM
it’s not as easy to regulate the heat in a wood burner as in an electric heater.
Posted by: rustic bedroom furniture | August 30, 2010 at 04:51 AM
Of course, it’s not as easy to regulate the heat in a wood burner as in an electric heater, so you could end up burning more wood than you really need, pushing your carbon footprint up.
Posted by: guild wars 2 gold | September 09, 2010 at 01:01 AM
I like this info..sharing is caring..for your information..i am also sharing information about lumber liquidators in my blog..you can visit my blog if you want..have a nice day :D
Posted by: Lumber Liquidators | September 14, 2010 at 10:21 AM
caring..for your information..i am also sharing information about lumber liquidators in my blog..you can visit my blog if you want..have a nice day :D
Posted by: wholesale lots | September 20, 2010 at 02:07 AM
It’s not as easy to regulate the heat in a wood burner as in an electric heater.
Posted by: woodworking books on cutting boards | September 29, 2010 at 04:37 AM
The people may safely be trusted to hear everything true and false, and to form a correct judgment. Were it fall to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers of newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.
Posted by: ffxiv gil | October 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Interesting thoughts. Surely more heat is lost through combustion than electric heat, so wouldn't electric heat be more efficient in that respect and a lower carbon footprint? Especially if the electricity is generated through wind or solar this would have the effect of an almost nominal carbon footprint.
Posted by: Fire Extinguishers | October 21, 2010 at 03:44 AM
How to get rid of old furniture in Bangalore city?
Posted by: recepti.hr | October 25, 2010 at 01:19 AM
Among other models sold by Chevrolet Europe were the Camaro, the Corsica/Beretta, the Corvette, the Blazer, and the TrailBlazer.
Posted by: BMW 320d SE | October 25, 2010 at 06:39 AM
I want to take this moment to say that I really love this blog. It has been a good resource of information for me. Thank you so much admin.
Posted by: Custom Remodelers | October 27, 2010 at 11:55 PM
Nice article. I could not bear to send my parents to a nursing home. In home care is the way for me.
Posted by: Seasonal Collection | October 28, 2010 at 02:06 AM
The online dating process works best if you are honest.Always exchange 3 emails before speaking on the phone. Ask questions that reveal more as the conversation progresses.
Posted by: online dating sites | October 28, 2010 at 02:54 AM
Great article Lot's of information to Read...Great Man Keep Posting and update to People..Thanks
Posted by: Inward investment Ireland | October 30, 2010 at 02:20 AM
Buying home theater furniture is one of the toughest jobs and also hardest furniture that you will ever purchase. The reason for bringing home this type of furniture is not only its aesthetic value, but also for experiencing ultimate comfort.
Posted by: long island payroll | November 02, 2010 at 12:45 AM
I admired this argument and i appreciated. I’ve apprehend all.
Posted by: ed hardy clothing | November 04, 2010 at 12:30 AM
I like your post & I will always be coming frequently to read more of your post. Thank you very much for your post once more.
Posted by: Invest in Sweden | November 22, 2010 at 01:51 AM
Cigarette smoking is very unhealthy cardiologically and respiratively but can be very healthy digestively, spiritually, and temperately. Make sure you decide which values are important to you.
Posted by: smoke51 coupon | December 02, 2010 at 09:11 PM
Expenses are at every step and you are the only one who spend money without much thinking!
Posted by: wholesale shoes | December 14, 2010 at 04:19 AM
This can be a great plug-in. Might as well try it soon. Thanks for sharing!
Posted by: wholesalers | December 16, 2010 at 05:10 AM
I appreciate your indepth article. I used a wood burning stove when I lived on the farm to heat our home. I even used it for cooking sometimes. Thanks again for your excellent article.
Posted by: Portable Generator Safety | January 16, 2011 at 01:54 PM
Hi
I just came to your post and reading your blog it is very impressive me i found some important tips about wood versus using electricity thanks a lot for sharing such type of informative topics.
http://www.wood-orangery.co.uk
Posted by: Mark Osborne | February 11, 2011 at 04:33 AM
Good post. I will post this into my twitter account.
Posted by: Russian wife | February 12, 2011 at 11:44 PM
I enjoyed reading it. I need to read more on this topic...I admiring time and effort you put in your blog, because it is obviously one great place where I can find lot of useful info.
Posted by: escapadas baratas | February 17, 2011 at 05:29 AM
Yes, you can work out if electric power is cleaner than wood burning. However, how accurate are the findings. They say that fossil fuels will run out and when they do, we will have no choice but to use wind turbines etc to produce our energy. Hopefully the world will then clean itself up - can't wait.
Posted by: Space Heaters | March 25, 2011 at 05:06 AM
I like this info..sharing is caring..for your information..i am also sharing information about have a nice day :D
Posted by: İşyeri Sigortası | May 03, 2011 at 11:14 AM
this is indeed a nice blog you have..i am sure that they will learn lots of things about this blog..thank you for the information...
Posted by: mobile spy reviews | May 03, 2011 at 11:38 PM
I think many of the herbs are stronger than carbon sequesters the trees anyway. I would like to take this opportunity to say I love this blog.
Posted by: תנור תעשייתי | July 19, 2011 at 10:26 PM
I got very good information burning wood actually has no carbon footprint because wood is a "bio-fuel" and a "renewable" resource, and trees that replace the tree cut for firewood will absorb the global-warming carbon dioxide given off when wood is burned. This is true in the long run, but if we're serious about global warming, there is no long run, as I've already demonstrated here. The reasoning is simple: Even one of the fastest-growing, quickest-sequestering trees that sprouts up today would require 50 years or more to absorb the carbon emitted by burning a single cord (128 cubic feet) of wood (about the amount in a foot-thick 40-foot-long log). With slower growers, we’re talking a century or so
Posted by: payday loans | July 29, 2011 at 04:42 AM
Alternating use would be better (only for those who have both a fireplace and a heater). But to those who only have one heat source, conserving is the best way to limit their carbon footprint.
Posted by: Victor Wetherbee | August 01, 2011 at 01:12 PM
Thanks, I'm going to have nightmares tonight.
Posted by: radii supra shoes | September 27, 2011 at 10:53 AM