Quantcast

Sierra Magazine: Explore, enjoy and protect the planet.
The Locavore's Dilemma - Sierra Daily
Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Contact Us

March April 2014

Read the latest issue of Sierra

« The Most Polluted Places on the Planet | Main | World Carbon: The Big Picture »

Sierra Daily

Jan 31, 2011

The Locavore's Dilemma

In recent years many environmentalists have fixated on the notion of eating as close to home as possible. There are plenty of good reasons for doing so: preserving agricultural open space, supporting family farms, and keeping regional food traditions alive, to name a few. However, one of the most widely cited reasons--reducing greenhouse-gas emissions associated with transporting the food to market, sometimes known as "food miles"--may be greatly overstated. 

According to a new study be Christopher Weber and H. Scott Matthews in Environmental Science and Technology, a much larger source of greenhouse emissions is the production phase--the fertilizers, feed, and other inputs it takes to produce the food. This accounts for 83 percent of the average U.S. household's carbon footprint for food consumption.

Transportation as a whole represents only 11% of life-cycle GHG emissions, and final delivery from producer to retail contributes only 4%. . . . [F]or the average American household, "buying local" could achieve, at maximum, around a 4-5% reduction in GHG emissions due to large sources of both COand non-CO2 emissions in the production of food."

Sounds like bad news, right? Despair not! According to the authors' lifecycle analyses, it's far more important what one eats rather than how close it is:

Shifting less than 1 day per week's (i.e., 1/7 of total calories) consumption of red meat and /or dairy to other protein sources or a vegetable-based diet could have the same climate impact as buying all household food from local providers.

Put in other terms, eating totally local would result in GHG reductions equivalent to driving 1,000 miles less per year, while eschewing red meat for one day would be the same as driving 1,160 miles less. Meatless Monday, here we come!

--Paul Rauber

User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate.

Up to Top