Sierra Daily: October 2011
Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Contact Us

March April 2014

Read the latest issue of Sierra

« September 2011 | Main | November 2011 »

23 posts from October 2011

Oct 06, 2011

House of Representatives Creates Jobs--for Undertakers


Well that was a bold move on the jobs front! While President Obama was over in the East Room urging Congress to vote on his American Jobs Act (and openly ridiculing the notion that rolling back environmental regulations would do anything to increase employment), the House was voting to pass H.R. 2681, a bill that would block critical protections against mercury pollution from cement plants. Cement kilns are second only to coal-fired power plants as sources of toxic mercury, producing some 23,000 pounds a year. But today's vote in the House would nullify restrictions on mercury pollution from the cement industry, as well as regulations on dioxins, arsenic, and lead. Together with last week's passage of the TRAIN Act, which similarly repealed protections from mercury et al from power plants, the EPA estimates that the bills will result in

  • 32,500 more premature deaths;
  • 19,500 additional heart attacks; and
  • 208,000 asthma attacks that otherwise would have been avoided.

So there's your alternative jobs bill! After all, 32,500 people don't just bury themselves; it will take lots of embalmers, gravediggers, ministers, and florists to meet the robust new demand.

--Paul Rauber

Photo by iStock.

Oct 04, 2011

You and Your Carbon


So if this climate-change business gets really serious, can't we just deploy some geo-engineering marvel to block the sun, cool the oceans, or just suck carbon out of the air? Today at Wonkbook, Brad Plumer gives a nice primer of climate-manipulation proposals:

We could [plant] more trees, although there’s only so much land to go around (especially as demand for cropland grows). We could try to fertilize the ocean with iron to promote the growth of plankton, which absorb CO2. We could try to speed up natural processes that take CO2 out of the air, such as rock weathering. Or someone could just invent a machine to scoop up the carbon directly. 

If only! Well here comes Tom Murphy, an associate professor of physics at UC San Diego, to spread a big wet blanket on that notion. In "Putting the carbon emissions genie back in the bottle," Murphy calculates that each American produces roughly their body weight in CO2 each day. That's about 25 square meters of pure carbon dioxide--enough to fill the red cube pictured above. The larger pink cube below is how much CO2 that average person produces over 40-years. If you "sequestered" that CO2 by binding it into limestone, just the daily dose would produce a brick weighing 115 kg--about 250 pounds. Squirreling away the 40-year amount would produce a block 8.6 meters on a side--that's the gray cube.

Where could we stash these giant bricks of limestone? They’re kind-of an eyesore in the back yard. In total, we’re talking about a Mount Everest-scale cube 10 km on a side. Wait a minute—didn’t we make a hole in the ground to extract the CaO in the first place? Yes, but this hole is only 45 percent the volume of the ultimate value-added brick. Maybe that’s half the battle, but half of a gigantic volume is still a gigantic volume. The point is not that we do not have enough room on the planet to accommodate these fantasy bricks of limestone, but just that they are not inconsequential things, at a personal scale. 

There's much more--including a discussion of what a CO2 air scrubber might look like--but for that you'll have to read Murphy's engaging post. It provides a much needed tonic to all the talk of "carbon capture and sequestration." It also brings to mind what English philosopher J.L. Austin said in How to Do Things With Words: "There are easier ways to kill a cat than drowning it in butter." Rather than finding a place to put our personal 8.6-meter cubes of carbon, it would be easier all around to just get Beyond Coal and Beyond Oil.

--Paul Rauber

Bear Tricks

Bearbanner Funnyman Stephen Colbert uses the recent news of a Lake Tahoe black bear that went for a joyride in and trashed a vacationing family’s Toyota Prius to update his long-running crusade against ursines. (“Apparently a bear also shifts in the woods,” the host of Comedy Central's The Colbert Report muses.) The thought of a bear at the wheel of a hybrid vehicle (with coveted California carpool-lane stickers, no less) gave Colbert plenty of fodder. Watch his take on “sanctimonious enviro-bears” and “grrr-nola munchers” here. (And learn something useful about black bears from the California Department of Fish and Game here.)

-- Reed McManus

Image: California Department of Fish and Game

User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate.

Up to Top

Sierra Club® and "Explore, enjoy and protect the planet"® are registered trademarks of the Sierra Club. © 2009 Sierra Club.
The Sierra Club Seal is a registered copyright, service mark, and trademark of the Sierra Club.