Quantcast

Sierra Magazine: Explore, enjoy and protect the planet.
Slouching Toward a BPA Ban - Sierra Daily
Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Contact Us

March April 2014

Read the latest issue of Sierra

« Your Carbon Couchprint | Main | Winner Wind »

Sierra Daily

Jan 29, 2013

Slouching Toward a BPA Ban

PrintoutTen years ago, Sierra published one of the very first articles linking the chemical bisphenol-A (BPA) to reproductive and developmental problems. At the time, the substance was nearly ubiquitous, notably in clear, hard plastic #7 water bottles. The story led the Sierra Club to quickly withdraw its line of polycarbonate bottles. Today, the field is dominated by metal bottles--although major manufacturer Sigg continued to use BPA in bottle linings until August, 2008.

(For more on hydration hardware, see "Drinking Buddies" in our current issue.)

Meanwhile, evidence against BPA has continued to mount. Frances Cerra Whittelsey, who wrote our groundbreaking piece, followed late last year with a short update on why the FDA is dragging its feet on banning the stuff. (She has a much more comprehensive version on her fine blog, The Equalizer.) While the agency dawdles, Suffolk County, New York, has banned sales receipt paper coated with BPA, and California is moving to declare BPA a reproductive health hazard (albeit at a high exposure level). With BPA-free alternatives readily available, why are we still using the stuff at all?

Image by iStock

HS_PaulRauberFINAL (1)

PAUL RAUBER is a senior editor at Sierra. He is the author, with Carl Pope, of the happily outdated Strategic Ignorance: Why the Bush Administration Is Recklessly Destroying a Century of Environmental Progress. Otherwise he is a cyclist, cook, and father of two. Follow him on Twitter @paulrauber.

 

User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate.

Up to Top