Don't Worry About the Doves
by Jon Schwedler
Hi-- Today we've got a guest blogger, my compatriot Bart Semcer of the Sierra Club:
Earlier this week I noticed that mourning doves were once again in the wooded marsh around my home. One of the most abundant gamebirds in America, mourning doves are also one of the most popular with hunters. Of the estimated 400 million doves that fly across the continent, law abiding hunters kill approximately 22.7 million each year.
I enjoy hunting doves, both for the social
nature of dove hunting and the culinary opportunities the
birds provide. With this being Earth Week I began wondering if global warming
might have an impact on doves and dove hunting. After doing some research I am happy saying that for doves, the news is
not so bad. U.S.
Forest Service scientists predict that
climate change will likely have little effect on doves, and there may even be
population increases in Northern Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan’s Upper
Peninsula if warming temperatures result in less balsam fir forest.
Thankfully we need not worry about global warming and the
future of the doves. But I don’t feel we
can call ourselves conservationists and only be concerned about one species, no
matter how much we value it. If
additional research is accurate, global warming threatens fish, wildlife and
our outdoor heritage nationwide. If we
are conservationists we should be paying close attention and taking action.
The U.S. Forest Service scientists who reported a good outlook for doves also expect a “withdrawal” of ruffed grouse from the coastal regions of the Northeastern States and from possibly all of the Great Lakes Region, resulting from an expected near total loss of paper birch. Some scientists predict a loss of up to 99% of large habitat areas for bull trout in the Rocky Mountains. In the Southern Appalachians, researchers are anticipating the loss of 97% of trout waters under some climate change models.
These may only be predictions but they are dire ones. I can
only speak for myself but I value our outdoor heritage enough to think we
should not gamble with it. As part of
America’s new energy future I would like to do everything I can to secure a
place for fish, wildlife and all who enjoy it and I would like to help others
do the same.
Sierra Club’s recently launched Resilient Habitats
Initiative, is a bold and optimistic effort to confront the threat of
climate change to fish and wildlife by applying the best available science to
efforts that secure habitat today so we can still enjoy fish and wildlife in a
warmer tomorrow.
The Resilient Habitats Initiative engages people in fish and
wildlife conservation through a combination of education, advocacy and hands-on
projects that protect and improve habitat. With the help of partner agencies
and organizations Sierra Club is optimistic that this effort will be successful
in making sure that there will be grouse to shoot, trout to catch and a wealth
of creation to enjoy for generations to come.
This is a blog written by someone who is ignorant about mourning doves as an animal and views them only as something to shoot and eat. Here's the truth.
1. According to many scientific reports, mourning doves do mate for life. The killing of so many doves puts a speedy end to these relationships and must have a negative impact on breeding success.
2. Mourning doves are not prolific breeders as one is often led to believe. In New York, they usually produce 3 broods a year with a maximum of 2 young per brood. The average number of young a pair of doves will produce in a season is 4.5. Bluebirds, on the other hand, will also breed 3 times a year and will produce as many as 5 young per brood. Wrens will nest twice a season and produce 7 young per brood.
3. There are 5 subspecies of mourning dove, 3 of which breed in the U.S. All population studies conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are of the species in general and do not take into consideration the populations of the various subspecies. The statement that the mourning dove population is large and can withstand hunting is not based on fact. For example, the mourning dove of New York is mostly Zenaida macroura carolinensis. Ohio tends to have both Z.m.c. as well as Z.m. marginella. Some Z.m.m. may migrate through New York in the spring and fall. With the hunting of mourning doves so wide spread and indiscriminate, we may very well be driving some subspecies to extincting without even knowing it.
Posted by: Ronda Roaring | May 13, 2008 at 12:56 PM
Hunters are murderers of animals.
It doesn't matter about the numbers; it's about the suffering.
Posted by: Janet Fink | May 13, 2008 at 08:56 PM
Callous attitudes like this towards other creatures is exactly why I stopped supporting Sierra Club several years back.
Posted by: Weebitty | May 13, 2008 at 11:45 PM