« After Sandy, We Need a Climate Champ Like Cory Booker in New Jersey | Main | Power Africa or Power Oil and Gas Profits? »

September 11, 2013

Kentucky's Coal Challenges -- Public Health, Clean Water, and Clean Air

KFTC imageThis week's column focuses on some big coal-related news items out of the Bluegrass State, where some inspiring Beyond Coal activists are making waves.
First, some good news: In a victory for clean water and public health, late yesterday a Kentucky circuit court overruled a lax permit that allowed Louisville Gas and Electric (LG&E) to dump large amounts of mercury, arsenic,  and other pollutants into the Ohio River from its Trimble County Generating Station coal-fired plant.
That good decision news comes along with a bad one: A Kentucky judge just ruled that a mountaintop- removal coal mine in Knott County does "not significantly affect the quality of the human environment."

We're hoping that doesn't continue a trend of pro-coal decisions on mountaintop-removal coal mining. Right now a major pending decision is whether the Environmental Protection Agency rejects Kentucky's revision of clean water protections in the state.
Kentucky has proposed revisions to its water-quality standards for the toxic pollutant selenium -- revisions that benefit the coal industry. The standards the Kentucky Division of Water has proposed are even worse than the ones that EPA rejected in 2004 as too weak to protect aquatic life.
Already, more than 40,000 Kentuckians have sent a message to the EPA telling it to protect their waterways. (You can, too, take action right here!)
Currently, water testing for selenium is done by directly sampling the water immediately downstream from mountaintop-removal coal-mining valley fills. These fills are created when mountaintop-removal mine operators blow the tops off of mountains and then dump the waste into nearby valleys, destroying and polluting waterways and hurting wildlife.
The proposed revisions would drastically weaken the selenium water-testing protocol downstream from mountaintop-removal coal-mining sites. Instead of trying to protect Kentuckians from harmful pollution and preserve the state's beautiful waterways and wildlife, officials are working to ensure that the interests of King Coal take precedence over the needs of the residents, and natural heritage, of the state.
What's worse, this decision would act as a starting gun for West Virginia and Virginia to do the same thing, by setting a poor precedent on water-quality protections and reversing current standards.
We are hoping the EPA makes the right decision to reject Kentucky's proposed changes. Kentuckians -- and all Americans -- deserve clean-water and pollution safeguards that will protect their health. Even famed Kentucky author Wendell Berry weighed in on making sure the EPA does the right thing.
Elmer smith plant adFinally, we switch to the Kentucky coal industry's air pollution. Check out the photo/ad to the left. (Click here to see a larger PDF of the ad)
The Elmer Smith coal plant in Owensboro, Kentucky, sits right next to a new hospital (not to mention the Ohio River). With at least 13 percent of Daviess County residents suffering from asthma, and many more suffering from other respiratory and heart problem associated with burning coal, local activists want Elmer Smith to leave the neighborhood.
According to the Clean Air Task Force, Elmer Smith contributes to 170 asthma attacks annually, as well as 10 deaths and 16 heart attacks.
That ad to the left ran in the local newspaper and has gotten some serious attention. The campaign behind it has even prompted a city official to join the local Sierra Club and offer to help in this fight against the Elmer Smith coal plant.
What's more, the Owensboro Municipal Utility, which owns the plant, is also contracting to buy coal from a proposed strip mine site in Daviess County. Strip mines, like the one slated for Daviess County, destroy a community's air quality and contribute to sickness in local residents. The strip mine would sit next to a Girl Scouts camp, which for two years has mobilized organizers and local residents to fight the proposal.
"The community needs to kick coal out of the neighborhood," says Rick Fowler, an Owensboro resident and chair of the Pennyrile Group of the Sierra Club's Cumberland Chapter.

"It's time for Owensboro to join the 21st century and protect Daviess County from the harmful effects of stripmining and coal burning. We should learn from our Ohio and Indiana neighbors, who are enjoying a boom of employment in renewable energy."
Sounds like a good message and mission for the entire country.

-- Heather Moyer, Sierra Club

Mountaintop-removal mining site photo courtesy of Kentuckians For The Commonwealth.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kentucky's Coal Challenges -- Public Health, Clean Water, and Clean Air:

User comments or postings reflect the opinions of the responsible contributor only, and do not reflect the viewpoint of the Sierra Club. The Sierra Club does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any posting. The Sierra Club accepts no obligation to review every posting, but reserves the right (but not the obligation) to delete postings that may be considered offensive, illegal or inappropriate.

Up to Top

Find us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Rss Feed

Sierra Club Main | Contact Us | Terms and Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy/Your California Privacy Rights | Website Help

Sierra Club® and "Explore, enjoy and protect the planet"® are registered trademarks of the Sierra Club. © 2013 Sierra Club.
The Sierra Club Seal is a registered copyright, service mark, and trademark of the Sierra Club.